Increase Font Size Option 5 Reset Font Size Option 5 Decrease Font Size Option 5
Home | House | Maintenance | How to Cut Your Electricity in Half -- and do it for less than $100
facebook_16 Facebook twitter_16 Twitter RSSRSS
 

Member Information






Forgot login?
No account yet? Register
How to Cut Your Electricity in Half -- and do it for less than $100 Print E-mail
(13 votes, average 4.77 out of 5)
House - Maintenance
Written by Omie Ismail   
Sunday, 20 September 2009 16:00
Article Index
How to Cut Your Electricity in Half -- and do it for less than $100
Kill A Watt
Water and Heat
All Pages

The current rage among environmentalists is installing solar panels on rooftops to cut their electricity bills. While solar is a great way to save money over the long haul, in the short run it sucks up a wad of cash ($20,000 to $30,000) and the payback period, even with incentives, can be 10 plus years. For the average El Cheapo, that doesn't add up to   a great investment. There is no arguing that solar energy is environmentally correct and that alone can make you feel warm and fuzzy inside. But there are cheaper alternatives that don't require you to spend a small fortune. Why spend twenty thousand dollars when there you could make a serious dent in your next utility bill by investing $100?

 

 

Compact Fluorescents (CFL): By now, you would think everybody with a grain of environmental conscience would have made the switch to CFLs. But in a casual survey of immediate circle of family and friends,  I found less than half of them had bothered to change the bulbs. And even the minority that had taken the intiative, quite a few still had plenty of incandescent bulbs. Somebody ought to write "Compact Flourescent bulbs for Dummies." It would be the shortest book in history. Because all you have to know is that CFLs produce the same amount of light with 20% of  energy that you consume with a regular bulb. And if that isn't enough of an incentive, you might be able to get your CFLs free from your local  utility. Many utilities run programs to encourage the switch to CFLs by giving out 4 or 8 free bulbs. Our utility gave us $100 worth for free! By all means, take them up on the offer. But even if you have to pay for them, CFLs will pay for themselves in under a year.

 

Tip #1: If you don't want to change the bulbs at one time, figure out which lights you use the most and start by replacing those because that will have the greatest impact on your electric bill. Save the lights that you use only a few hours a week for later.

 

 

Buying CFLs has gotten easier as home improvement stores and they are overstocked with CFLs because consumers have been slow to make the transition. For under three dollars, you should be able to purchase a CFL that consumes 13 watts and delivers the same amount of light as a 60 watt bulb. If you shop around you might be able to buy them for around two dollars. A few years ago the same CFL would have required you to shell out six dollars. If you have a Walmart or a Target near your home, grab a dozen on your next trip.

 

We replaced about 60% of the lighting in our home and saw our electric bill drop by about 14%. For us, that’s enough to take the family out to dinner.



Comments
Add New RSS
+/-
Write comment
Name:
Email:
 
Website:
Title:
 
Please input the anti-spam code that you can read in the image.
Kelley |2010-07-24 19:48:34
I can't use CFL bulbs in several of my rooms as I have an autistic daughter who cannot tolerate those types of lights for long. She gets agitated and fussy. In her high school classroom, they were nice enough to make sure she sat by a large window, and they were able to switch off the nearest flourescent to her. Some people just can't tolerate the minute flickering these bulbs produce.
D |2010-06-15 13:54:21
I'm not a fan of CFLs, because I'm not a fan of fluorescent lights. The spectrum of light emitted by them is in the blue-green range, and has been shown to cause headaches and depressive symptoms in people. Incandescent lights are closer to natural sunlight (in the yellow-orange part of the spectrum) and cause less problems for people.

If CFLs put out light that was warm, (and did not require a HAZMAT crew to come and clean if God forbid you drop one and break it) I'd consider using them. So for now, I'm sticking with incandescent bulbs.
J  - You missed something on water heaters |2010-06-09 12:18:48
If you have an electric water heater, you can put it on a timer. I did this, and my water heater (in its blanket) is only ON 3 hours a day, in the morning, when we take showers. The water stays hot all day, and if you need a bunch of hot water (throwing a party, or massive laundry when the kids come home) there is an override switch. This was recommended to me by my electric company when I had my house audited, and it saves me $30/month.
frugal nomad  - Now there's a tip worth adding to the list |2010-06-09 14:12:06
You get my vote for best tip.
esther  - 10 best cheap articles |2010-05-26 06:29:48
One thing that no one is bringing up is that CFL's contain mercury, diposal of them is hazardous to the environment and needs to be performed with special precautions. If they break in your home, they place mercury well above any approved safety levels. Clean up should only be performed by a professional who understands the clean up of hazardous waste
Vince  - LED |2009-10-23 04:59:16
It seems to me that LiveCheap.com is not up with the times. Very soon those CFL will be thrown away and replaced by LED which are far superior. LED flood lamps are available at Costco for about $10 a piece. I have replaced all my kitchen recessed lights with LED.
Omiewon  - LED is a great choice, but there is the cost facto |2009-10-23 08:48:12
LED is a great choice. I know a guy that runs a big LED lighting company and the commercial establishments are really able to save a ton with LED. LED is the wave of the future in many ways, but the cost has to come down.
CFL prices have plummeted and in many cases are free or so low cost that it just doesn't make sense to pass it up. LED will go through its cycle and it will drop like CFL, but right now its fairly $$$$ and the ROI isn't as good as CFL at nearly zero cost.

The crazy thing is that when LiveCheap did an informal survey on CFL, more than 50% of people still had 100% incandescent. Cmon people!

We'll take a look at the math on the two. For the environment I think that LED probably is the better choice, but we should evaluate that. Thanks for the good comments. Anyone else out there install LED? Would be good to get some thoughts on the LED/CFL debate.
Nee |2009-10-22 14:36:20
I love saving on my electric bill but CFL don't work with dimmer outlets. Is there a solution? Seems that the only alternative is to use regular bulbs in these fixtures.
Omiewon  - There are dimmable CFLs |2009-10-22 15:04:16
You have to be careful to read their labels but they do exist. We ran into this same problem. Link below will give you more information.

http://energystar.custhelp.com/cgi-bin/energystar.cfg/php/enduser/std_ adp.php?p_faqid=2565
Sleuth  - Saving on the Electric Bill |2009-10-20 11:12:48
I find everyone wants to save on their electric bill; but, people need a guide so that they know what wattage to buy in fluoresant bulbs. The only place that I saw a guide was in a very expensive catalog. These power companies need to step up to the plate and provide such guides so that the novice can make a decision about what wattage to buy. This could be one reason that people are hesitant to make the transition to CFL's.
 
Joomla Templates by Joomlashack