Increase Font Size Option 5 Reset Font Size Option 5 Decrease Font Size Option 5
Home | House | Maintenance | Is it Time to Get Rid of Cable Yet? - The Economics
facebook_16 Facebook twitter_16 Twitter RSSRSS
 

Member Information






Forgot login?
No account yet? Register
Is it Time to Get Rid of Cable Yet? - The Economics Print E-mail
(8 votes, average 4.75 out of 5)
House - Maintenance
Written by Omie Ismail   
Friday, 16 October 2009 12:56
Article Index
Is it Time to Get Rid of Cable Yet?
Roadblocks
The Economics
All Pages

Economics:

What are the economics of dumping your cable in favor of broadband a content service? If you assume that your cable bill is $60 a month plus taxes and fees of approximately $10, you are currently paying about $840 per year in after tax dollars. In addition if you use TIVO, you are paying another $150 a year bringing you to a cool thousand. Tivo is entirely unnecessary for Internet broadcasts. Assume that you want 3 full seasons of shows that you would have gotten with your premium subscription. Those subscriptions will cost you about $80 on iTunes or may be nothing additional on Netflix. Assuming that you get a Netflix account, you would be paying an extra $120 a year with tax. Lets estimate $200 per year. So if you go from Cable/Tivo to Broadband/Netflix/iTunes, you could save up to $800 per year, which is significant. Considering that it may take you $1,200 to $1,400 in salary to pay for that $800, you really may want to consider making the switch. Another way of thinking about: with the money you saved you could go to the movies with another person every weekend with the difference, and movies are fairly expensive.

If you are looking to save on one of your major expenses, consider getting rid of your cable subsciptions and move to an streaming only subscription.

What do you do? Have a suggestion for our readers, let us know in the comments.

 

 

Like this Article? Get our stuff delivered to you every day for free by entering your email below:

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Want to Learn How to Live Better and Cheaper?

Get our Famous 5 Rules of Living Cheaply today! You'll get over 20 pages of great content for free with full access to our Cheap University.



Bookmark this article:
Twitter! Facebook! Del.icio.us! Digg! Google! Yahoo! Reddit! Mixx! Live! StumbleUpon!


Comments
Add New RSS
+/-
Write comment
Name:
Email:
 
Website:
Title:
 
Please input the anti-spam code that you can read in the image.
ron  - dropped satellite |2010-09-06 13:10:51
i was paying close to $900yr.i bought a small indoor antenna($50)and hooked it up to a dvr($250)and now get 11 digital tv stations(free).luckily my library is only 2 miles away and has thousands of dvds that can be checked out for a whole week,5 at a time(free).i dont miss that $900yr bill at all!
Pam  - Cut the satellite |2010-05-25 03:04:54
My husband and I started looking for ways to cut back expenses when his company began sending people home without pay for 1 week every month. We realized exactly what this article is saying. We had all these channels, paid this bill that was always rising, and we only watched a few channels. Our solution was to cut the TV back to only local channels and buy a Roku, to stream video from our existing Netflix account. It was great! We love it. We made the switch over a month ago and are enjoying the on-demand content. I highly recommend this. The roku cost 69.95, one time and you own it. The total savings for us is over $50/month. We cut some other expenses as well. But, this seemed to be the most difficult decision for the family. We were definitely emotionally attached to having that service available, even if we weren't using it very much.
Ed  - I dumped cable 2 months ago |2010-05-18 18:38:05
I noticed that I was watching TV infrequently and using the internet more and more. I canceled my cable altogether and now watch the network and PBS channels. To be honest, I don't really miss cable. I can watch hulu if I want to, but rarely do. TV is passive entertainment and I seem to prefer the internet. Sorry cable company.
Barry McGee  - Mr |2010-05-17 08:49:59
Tonberry, you are exactly right. Comcast structures the so called bundle's so you do not save by getting rid of something. I called them last week. Hey, how much will I save if I get rid of my home phone $4.00, but u charge $29.99.deregulation, if thats what it's called has screwed cunsumers and made comp. like comcast billions.I live in Chesterfield County, Va. and comcast is the only cable co allowed in this county thanks to the board of supp. Whats up with that. My hard phone line I can get any comp I choose. Getting pissed so thats enough for now.I just wished i new how we could fight back. Barry
tonberry |2010-04-07 08:17:43
i only have internet through my provider and that is $65 per month, they charge you more when you do not have cable too, so with cable the internet would be 45 but then the cable part makes it even more expensive
Omiewon  - $45 a month, ouch |2010-04-07 09:37:59
With cable that is ridiculous especially if it is the cheapest option. Cable Internet shouldn't be more than $25 a month. In other countries, Internet access is so much cheaper than the U.S. In France they have speeds that are likely 10 times faster than our cable for about the same price. They are also deploying 100MBit/sec connections!
chitown  - save the tivo! |2010-01-05 17:07:18
we're also ditching my new wife's old $100/month cable plan. we mostly watched network tv shows but thru comcast on-demand, and we watched a lot of the on-demand movies and the free movie channels (movieplex and a few others). we recently started a mix of netflix (they have tons of on-demand programming included for free with the dvd rentals), tivo (to record and watch on-demand network tv from a digital antenna), and hulu.com (for non-network tv shows like the daily show). we're getting the exact same programming as before but we'll be saving $88/month. we actually tried bargaining with comcast (we would have kept it for the sports), but they didn't want to budge so we got the enjoyment of telling them to bug off. we have cable internet access paid for by our employers for working from home, so our total tv bill will be just the $12/month tivo fee. plus tivo acts as an interface to the netflix on-demand. i haven't used itunes or amazon's video "rental" service, it seems like those would add up pretty fast, but might be nice every now and then. we'll test it as soon as we find something we can't watch with this setup.
chitown  - oops |2010-01-05 17:11:25
math error, we'll be paying $12/month for tivo + $13/month for netflix = $25/month. so that'll save us $75/month.

btw, we just grabbed an old pc to hookup to the tv, so my combined investment was the $20 for a dvi to hdmi cable.
Omiewon |2010-01-05 18:37:28
Chitown, love this kind of stuff. The cable companies have a real problem when the revenue is dropping from $100 to $25. And the Netflix is really like getting more since the newer movies that you get via DVD are really more like a replacement for Pay On-Demand which would cost you $4 a pop.

I think Amazon's service is looking like it will go down the tubes. They are starting to give lots of freebies when you buy their stuff. I recently got two free $5 downloads and didn't even bother to use them. One was restricted only to certain content, none of which I was interested, but the other was unlimited selection. I suppose I could mess around with it, but paying $4 a pop just isn't in the cards.
lakeview  - Cable and High speed are a waste |2009-10-19 19:37:59
Great idea. Agree completely about the useless channels. I have been wondering why we need both from the same provider. Seems like with high speed internet is way to go. Looking forward to using your advice. Great posting!
Omiewon  - Unbundling of Internet |2009-10-19 20:24:34
The thing that bothered me for years is that if you wanted Internet only the phone providers wouldn't let you have that. You had to pick up a phone line that you probably didn't need. The problem with the phone line is all the federal and state taxes that boost up the cost, not to mention the high long distance rates.
I did hear AT&T advertising $19 Internet only but the speed is pretty low 768/384. But the unbundling is a start that will make it easier to dump the cable operators. I also noticed that Directv is pushing $29 but again that's for 150 channels, 90% of which you will never watch.
kellyb  - read a book! |2009-11-12 20:11:45
My husband and I live quite cheaply although are always looking for ways to live even cheaper...thank you for the site! We spend $15.04 on cable/month...we are the only ones we know that don't have a more substantial package:( Nothing on our 24 year old tv? (Which is often) We play board games and read as a family. We couldn't be having more fun doing so!
Omiewon |2010-01-05 18:39:09
Not sure why cable should cost more than $15 a month. When I lived in Florida it was that much (guess they target the seniors with cheap cable). When I came to California basic cable was $35 for next to nothing. Just wish I could get HBO without the rest of it. A few more years.
 
Joomla Templates by Joomlashack