Increase Font Size Option 5 Reset Font Size Option 5 Decrease Font Size Option 5
Home | Shopping | Everything Else | Ten Ways Patriotic Consumers Can Shrink the Trade Deficit
In Southern California? Check out PulseLAfacebook_16 Facebook twitter_16 Twitter RSSRSS
 

Member Information






Forgot login?
Register
Ten Ways Patriotic Consumers Can Shrink the Trade Deficit Print E-mail
(14 votes, average 4.07 out of 5)
Shopping - Everything Else
Written by Ahmed Amr   
Wednesday, 26 May 2010 04:27
Article Index
Ten Ways Patriotic Consumers Can Shrink the Trade Deficit
Your Wardrobe
All Pages

If there is one economic issue that drives me up the wall it has to be the trade deficit - not just its size but the fact that we talk so little about it.  Maybe you don’t pay attention to the trade numbers, but I am sure you've noticed that most every consumer good on our shelves is made inChina_Flag China or East American_FlagAsia - including American flags.  Contrary to popular belief, the United States is a trading wimp that has run up trillions of dollars in trade deficits for thirty consecutive years. The evidence of our lack of competitiveness is littered in thousands of blighted communities from sea to shining sea that have been devastated by the loss of millions of manufacturing sector jobs since 2000. There’s a word for that - de-industrialization. If you want to rub a little salt into our Great Recession wound, here is little factoid that might shock you; the U.S. ran a trade surplus in nine of the 10 years of the Great Depression.

Now, before you overdose on Prozac, here is the good news - the trade deficit declined to $380 billion in 2009 about half of what it was in 2006. And the main reason for that was that recession-hammered American consumers restrained their appetites for imported goods and the weak dollar made our exports more attractive to foreign consumers.

So who was responsible for the trillions of dollars in trade deficits and the loss of millions of manufacturing jobs? The short answer is the American consumer. And who shrunk the deficit in 2009? Same answer – we did. Those two answers lead to a simple conclusion - it will be entirely up to patriotic consumers to continue reversing the trade imbalance. Here is a list of things you can do to help the cause and, while you’re at it, improve your finances.

1. Save energy. We’re importing close to 12 million barrels of oil each day. The less gas you burn, the less we’ll have to fork over for foreign oil. In 2009, the U.S. imported $204 billion in petroleum-based products. That accounted for more than half our trade deficit.

2. Check the label and be willing to pay just a little extra for a “Made in America” brand. The job you save maybe your own.

3. Keep your car longer. Even domestically manufactured cars have a high content of imported parts. If you really care about the environment and want to demonstrate your love of country, try doing without a second car.

4. Buy smaller houses. For one thing, you consume less energy when you live in a smaller home. For another, we import many of the materials that go into the construction of a house, from lumber to appliances and wiring.

5. Cut down on your electronics consumption. Virtually no TVs, audio equipment, computers, or gaming consoles are Made in America.. If you can do without that extra HDTV, just don’t buy it. Chances are you’ll do just fine by keeping that notebook computer for another year, even if the newer models are five ounces lighter.



Comments
Add New RSS
+/-
Write comment
Name:
Email:
 
Website:
Title:
 
Please input the anti-spam code that you can read in the image.
robert  - Number 8? |2010-07-28 15:09:52
Uhhh...The majority of Dryers and Lawnmowers are still made in the US aren't they?

8. If it’s broke - fix it. We all throw away stuff that can easily be fixed with a little tinkering because we can’t spare the time and it’s so cheap to replace it. Get in the habit of keeping your stuff in working order and consider fixing the lawnmower or the dryer before hauling it to the dump.
eross  - 10 best live cheap aricles |2010-06-01 06:20:34
Some additional sad facts: Americans have gotten farther away from "working with their hands". We are now diminishing the presence of farms and farm laborers. This is another source of American "home grown" products. We incarcerate at least 1% of our population at a cost of $40,000 to $80,000 a year to the taxpayer. This 3 million+ population could ideally be suitable to perform jobs for well below minimum wage and these jobs could be labeled as "job training" and the wages could be diverted towards paying their living expenses and child support. This underutilized man-power could also be used as migrant workers who earn the substandard wage.
redhatmamaw  - ALCU |2010-06-28 11:36:57
say that is humilating
cheaparse  - Not just manufacturing |2010-05-26 19:25:16
It's not just manufacturing jobs that have moved overseas. I work in software/IT and it's amazing to me how much technology, call center, and other work has also moved offshore. If I pick on 3 companies we look up to as some of our most well-run businesses -- GE, Accenture, Oracle -- they also among those who've move the most jobs overseas. The large majority of these jobs aren't ever coming back. Some might say this allows the US focus on higher value-added, higher-wage labor; but what worries me particularly about the offshore movement in technology is by moving foundational technology jobs offshore, we are basically providing overseas talent with a basic technical and business training. Could this provide the foundation for overseas talent to catch up to or outpace American innovation in the future?

So if you work in technology, I'd argue that patriotic employers should also consider the implications of offshore development. And if you are a technology consumer and care about American jobs, shouldn't this be a purchase consideration?

Just as one specific example, should the US Govt be awarding contracts to Accenture, who evades US taxes by HQ'ing in the Bahamas?
Ahmed Amr  - contributor |2010-05-27 01:14:24
Thanks for your input. Let me begin by answering the last question first - because you hit a raw nerve. I'm one of millions of old mainframe programmers that have tasted the bitter fruit of the outsourcing of IT jobs to India and other exotic destinations. Service jobs and technical and design work - even research and development jobs - can readily be outsourced.

Now to your question - should the US Government be awarding contracts to Accenture? The answer is obviously no. It seems to me if our elected officials can't demonstrate a bit of patriotism, we're in a heap of trouble. But regardless of where a company is headquartered - if you get a government contract - you need to demonstrate a commitment to hiring American workers.

With the business community, appeals to patriotism will fall on deaf ears. Capital has no nationality and is always willing to chase the dollar to the ends of the earth. It was the business community that lobbied for 'globalism' - not the American consumer. But once we get the ball rolling, there is a way to make them accountable. I'd start with the retailers. If 90% of Walmart's shelves are piled high with foreign merchandise, maybe 90% of American consumers should stop buying there. I guarantee we'd see a rapid change in their predatory business practices.

The first line of resistance is at the consumer level. Send the retailers a message.

Even with service jobs, a retail consumer can have an impact. If you get a scratchy voice on the phone that sounds like its from somewhere out of country, ask where they're calling from. And if you don't like the answer, cancel whatever the service is.

Once you get the ball rolling, there will be all kinds of creative ways to send a message to retailers, business leaders and the politicians. Make no mistake, it can be done. We just need to empower consumers to do their part and do it collectively.
cheaparse  - Regulatory nudge |2010-05-31 23:00:58
I'm personally skeptical we can rely on consumers to broadly change buying behaviors here. Being a patriotic consumer here often means paying more. In these economic times, I think most people make decisions based first on financials -- domestically produced goods and services are at a big disadvantage.

I don't see this movement getting stemmed unless our govt introduces some regulatory disincentives for outsourcing. What's tricky is to apply regulation that doesn't appear overly-protectionist (and incite retaliatory actions) and minimizes economic impact so our businesses remain globally competitive. In fact, I just came across an article about Chuck Schumer proposing legislation to help stem the call center outsourcing movement:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20100530/pl_nm/us_usa_outsourcing

We'll see whether this type of legislation can get through Congress and business lobbyists...
Ahmed Amr  - I saw that chick Schumer article |2010-06-01 03:33:05
No one can argue with the logic of your article. But there is one way consumers can pitch in which is to buy less of everything made overseas. I mean some products like electronics just can't be had with a 'made in America label" because we just don't do that kind of work anymore. So the only response is to buy as little of it as we can get by on.
frugal nomad  - Contributor |2010-05-26 15:26:45
Well, what you consider slave wages, look real good to a Chinese worker. In fact, he's seen some rapid strides in in his standard of living. China is now the second largest market for cars. Thirty years ago, you were lucky to have a bicycle. Construction is booming to the point of where they will be consuming half the world's cement and steel for the next few decades.

One of the things China has going for it is a huge domestic market and the average Chinese is getting a slice of the pie - maybe not a fair slice - but enough of a slice to taste the fruits of his labors.

The average Chinese is very proud of what he has accomplished. 9% annual growth means their economy doubles in size every eight years. And that figure is deceptive because most of the growth comes from manufacturing. Last year, China saw a 30% increase in its capital investments.

The Chinese have a work ethic second to none. Forget about the threat they pose to advanced economies like the United States and Japan; even third world countries like Egypt, where wages are even lower, have a difficult time competing with them.

We need to clear up our minds and admit that no matter how hard we work, they're going to eat our lunch and invite themselves to share our dinner. Unless we put up a little resistance and protect our manufacturing base by buying American or not buying at all.
haverwench |2010-05-27 14:38:43
...and also, get our educational system into shape so we can compete with those foreign workers for high-tech jobs.
Ahmed Amr  - That's also something to consider |2010-05-27 15:56:52
There is no doubt that we're missing the mark when it comes to the quality of our high school graduates. But our elite universities still rank as the best in the world. The only problem is a lot of the graduate students in engineering and computer science are from other countries and they return to those countries with splendid educations. We need to acknowledge the quality of the brains and brawns we are competing against. And once we do that, we need to take protective measures against them. We're losing this game and we're going to continue losing if we play on the same field. I'm all for being a bad sport - especially when I'm losing. The answer is to have stiff tariffs on imports to give a competitive edge to goods manufactured in this country and restructure the tax code to deincentivize American companies from shipping service jobs overseas. No more H1 Visas will put a whole lot of American programmers to work. Believe me, we can do without most of the imports we consume or we can at least import less of them. But at some point, you can't entirely depend on consumers. The government has to use a little coersion - it's called protectionism. It's not a dirty word. It's what Ross Perot warned us about twenty years ago - the huge sucking sound. If somebody hasn't heard it by now, they're tone deaf.
frugal nomad  - contributor |2010-05-26 11:57:36
First of all, thanks for commenting on the article. In terms of complaining to the management, take WalMarts, who exactly are you going to complain to? The store manager? The best way to register your complaint is not to buy the product, especially if there is an American manufactured substitute.

Allow me to take issue with your comment about 'flimsy' products. That might be the case today. But things are changing very rapidly. China is the largest importer of tools from Germany, France and Belgium. By tools, we mean manufacturing plants. They're buying the best. Eventually, they'll start producing first class tools of their own. China is also buying world class companies in Europe, America and Asia - which means they are also buying know how, technology and patents in addition to equipment than can be disassembled and shipped to China.

If China is communist, you'd never know it by visiting their cities. They might still be communist in the agricultural sector but when it comes to manufacturing - it's unfettered capitalism.

The Chinese government, even the Chinese Army, have stakes in many of these projects. So in many cases, a lot of the manufacturing technology they are buying up can very easily translate into military capability.

The only way to stem the tide is protectionism and if the government can't do it because of all the self-defeating trade agreements they have signed - there is nothing obliging an American consumer to go along. He still has the power to vote with his pocket book. And that's what will make a difference in the long run.

One last thing, Chinese Foreign students are the largest contingent of foreign students in America. Go to any Graduation ceremony and watch how many Phd's and Masters degrees in Engineering and Computer Science are awarded to these freshly minted scientists. They will go back to China and you will see how they improve the product.

Forty years ago, we used to joke about flimsy Japanese products. Twenty years ago, we used to scoff at Korean Products. You get the idea. Ten years from now, you will see the quality of Chinese products improve at a very rapid pace. Look at Singapore and multiply by a hundred. That's what China will look like thirty years from now. The question is how are we going to look thirty years from now.

The threat is real and the only way it can be taken on is for American consumers to demonstrate a little economic nationalism and they can start by not waving Chinese ma...
LB3309  - Think about it.... |2010-05-26 08:09:54
I have never understood why we support a Communist government which is known to suppress human rights and persecute Christians. But we do that EVERY time we buy a Chinese product! When you shop, be sure and complain to the store MANAGERS about the lack of US-made items, it that is the case. It would also help to BOYCOTT items made in China and foreign countries. Like the man said, the job you save may be your own!
PS--Have you ever noticed how flimsy those Chinese products are? They tend to break and/or break down a whole lot faster than American-manufactured items. So, in the long run, you are NOT saving any money when you buy foreign! You will end up having to buy more than one Chinese product when you could've bought a US-made one that would last several times as long!
John605  - It has to stop |2010-05-26 07:29:59
The number of empty stores and factories is absurd. It's not only low end stuff going to china any more. Easy to beat us when they pay slave wages.
 
Joomla Templates by Joomlashack